![]() |
State Budget Notes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PDF version of this paper ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THE PROBLEM FACING THE NEW BUDGETIn the State Budget Note of December 2001, CRC provided projections of operating budget gaps confronting the State as the FY2003 budget is developed. On January 15, 2002, the Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference adopted revised forecasts that will be used for the development of the General Fund-General Purpose (GF-GP) and School Aid Fund (SAF) budgets for FY2003. These new forecasts will be reflected in the Governor's budget to be presented on February 7, 2002. In addition, the State released the preliminary financial results from FY2001. The results were more favorable than expected, especially in the School Aid Fund, which finished with a surplus more than $200 million larger than the State had projected. The increased School Aid Fund surplus was principally the result of windfalls not likely to repeat themselves in subsequent years. The effect of these results is to make nearly $200 million more funding in the Rainy Day Fund available to support the FY2003 budget. The tables included in the December budget note are revised as follows. Included are some other minor revisions in spending items as well: General Fund-General PurposeThe FY2002 GF-GP revenue forecast is $50 million below the October Consensus and the FY2002 budget gap worsens as a result. The FY2003 GF-GP revenues are only slightly below the figure included in the December Budget Note and consequently the general conclusions are essentially unchanged. These projections incorporate additional costs identified in the December Note but excluded from the calculation of the overall problem. Failure to fund these additional costs would have the effect of reducing program services. For FY2003 the state will somehow have to close a gap of approximately $1 billion by some combination of spending cuts, one-time budget actions such as money from the Rainy Day fund, and revenue enhancements such as redirecting tobacco settlement revenues and delaying scheduled future tax cuts.
School Aid FundThe SAF revenue forecast for FY2002 is $24 million higher than the October consensus. In addition, the SAF balance carrying into FY2002 from FY2001 increased by $202 million from earlier estimates. This has the effect of reducing the Rainy Day Fund withdrawal for school aid making a larger amount potentially available to assist in the FY2003 GF-GP and SAF budgets. The projected Rainy Day Fund balance carrying into FY2003 is approximately $700 million, with $67 million already committed to the Durant settlement and transportation bonding.
The FY2003 SAF revenues are $92 million higher than the figure used in the December budget note and, combined with other minor adjustments reduce the gap for that year from $756 million to $642 million. These estimates of the gap include the cost of funding an increase in the per student foundation allowance from $6,500 to $6,700 as originally appropriated in the three-year School Aid budget. There is little likelihood that this increase will be included in the FY2003 budget proposal. Furthermore, in order to avoid cutting school aid spending from the FY2002 level, approximately $400 million of additional funding, potentially of a one-time nature, will have to be found. Assuming that the foundation allowance is maintained at $6,500, the overall problem between the two funds totals approximately $1.4 billion for FY2003. Adopting a multi-year strategic approach to solving this very large gap remains an important responsibility for state policy-makers to address.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||